Abstract

Objective Metaphyseal sleeve (MS) fixation in revision knee arthroplasty (RKA) among Western populations has been reported with very encouraging outcomes. The aim of this study was to report our experience with the use of MS in RKA among an Arabic population. Clinical and radiographic outcomes and implant survivorship were reported at a minimum follow-up of 2 years and a mean follow-up of 4.1 years. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on prospectively collected data of patients who underwent RKA with a MS in combination with a cementless stem (femoral or tibial). Range of motion (ROM) and Knee Society Score (KSS) were obtained pre- and postoperatively. Complications, occurrence of stem-tip pain, and implant survival were documented. Knee radiographs were obtained to evaluate the alignment and osseointegration or loosening of the MS. Results A total of 52 sleeves (27 tibial and 25 femoral) implanted in 27 RKAs (27 patients) were included. The mean follow-up period was 4.1 ± 1.8 (2–7.5) years. Postoperatively, the ROM improved from 89.3 ± 9.2 to 106.3 ± 11.4 (p = 0.19) and the KSS also significantly improved, from 102.9 ± 35.6 to 130.2 ± 33.7 (p < 0.001). One patient (3.7%) developed heterotopic ossification, and another one (3.7 %) had a stem-tip pain on the tibial side; both were managed conservatively. One patient (3.7 %) sustained a fracture and required reoperation. None of the sleeves showed progressive radiolucent lines, and none required revision. The aseptic survivorship and overall survivorship at a mean of 4.1 years were 100% and 96.3%, respectively. Conclusion MS provided successful midterm outcomes that were maintained in obese patients with different levels of constraint. Our series supports their use as a viable option in RKA.

Highlights

  • Metaphyseal sleeve (MS) fixation in revision knee arthroplasty (RKA) among Western populations has been reported with very encouraging outcomes. e aim of this study was to report our experience with the use of MS in RKA among an Arabic population

  • We identified a total of 52 sleeves (27 tibial and 25 femoral) in combination with 52 cementless stems implanted in 27 RKAs (27 patients). e mean follow-up period was 4.1 ± 1.8 (2–7.5) years

  • At the most recent follow-up, the preoperative Range of motion (ROM) improved from 89.3 ± 9.2 to 106.3 ± 11.4 (p 0.19). e Knee Society Score (KSS) significantly improved, from 102.9 ± 35.6 to 130.2 ± 33.7 (p < 0.001). ere was no significant correlation between the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) type and the functional outcome, the level of osseointegration, or implant survival (p 0.51, p 0.23, and p 0.3, respectively). ere were no intraoperative complications

Read more

Summary

Objective

Metaphyseal sleeve (MS) fixation in revision knee arthroplasty (RKA) among Western populations has been reported with very encouraging outcomes. e aim of this study was to report our experience with the use of MS in RKA among an Arabic population. Metaphyseal sleeve (MS) fixation in revision knee arthroplasty (RKA) among Western populations has been reported with very encouraging outcomes. A total of 52 sleeves (27 tibial and 25 femoral) implanted in 27 RKAs (27 patients) were included. MS provided successful midterm outcomes that were maintained in obese patients with different levels of constraint Our series supports their use as a viable option in RKA. 1. Introduction e extent of bone loss encountered in revision knee arthroplasty (RKA) is often underestimated on preoperative radiographs and may increase considerably during the explantation of implants [1]. Ese usually involve the use of stems, cementless or cemented, combined with several reconstructive options ranging from simple cancellous bone grafting and cement, metal augments and blocks, to total segment replacement of the distal femur and/or proximal tibia. Clinical and radiographic outcomes and implant survivorship were reported at a minimum follow-up of 2 years and a mean follow-up of 4.1 years

Materials and Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call