Abstract

Background: total hip replacement (THR) is a rare surgical option in children and adolescents with disabling hip diseases. The aim of this study is to report results from a retrospective cohort of patients aged 18 years or less who underwent cementless Ceramic-on-Ceramic (CoC) THR at a single institution, investigating clinical and radiographic outcomes, survival rates, and reasons for revision of the implants. Materials and methods: we queried the Registry of Prosthetic Orthopedic Implants (RIPO) to identify all children and adolescents undergoing THR between 2000 and 2019 at a single Institution. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing cementless CoC THR, aged less than 18 years at surgery, followed for at least 2 years. Sixty-eight patients (74 hips) matched all the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. We assessed the clinical and radiographic outcomes, the rate of complications, the survival rate, and reasons for revision of the implants. Results: The mean follow-up was 6.6 ± 4.4 years (range 2–20). The most frequent reason for THR was post-traumatic or chemotherapy-induced avascular necrosis (38%). The overall survival rate of the cohort was 97.6% (95% CI: 84.9–99.7%) at 5 years of follow-up, 94.4% (95% CI: 79.8–98.6%) at 10 years and 15 years of follow-up. Two THR in two patients (2.7%) required revision. With the numbers available, Cox regression analysis could not detect any significant interaction between preoperative or intraoperative variables and implant survivorship (p-value 0.242 to 0.989).” The average HOOS was 85 ± 14.3 (range 30.6–100). Overall, 23 patients (48%) reported excellent HOOS scores (>90 points), 21 patients (44%) reported acceptable HOOS scores (60–90 points) while 4 patients (8%) reported poor outcomes (<60 points). Twenty-one patients (43%) were regularly involved into moderate- to high-intensity sport activities (UCLA ≥ 6). Conclusions: Cementless CoC THR is a successful procedure in children and teenagers, having demonstrated high implant survivorship and low rates of complications and failure. A meticulous preoperative planning and implant selection is mandatory, to avoid implant malposition, which is the main reason of failure and revision in these cases. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of the THR on the psychosocial wellbeing of teenagers, as well as risks and benefits and cost-effectiveness in comparison to the hip preserving surgical procedures.

Highlights

  • Disabling hip diseases in children and adolescents may be due to a wide number of congenital or developmental pathologies, such as avascular necrosis (AVN) Legg-CalvèPerthes disease (LCPD), slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) [1]

  • Despite a plethora of “hip preserving” surgical procedures have been developed in recent decades, joint salvage may be an unsatisfying solution in the case of end-stage degenerative hip disease, with severe pain, disability and overall decreased quality of life [2,3,4]

  • Total hip replacement (THR) is a safe and effective option for treating end-stage hip osteoarthritis in adults, but concerns arise when this solution is considered for children and adolescents

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Disabling hip diseases in children and adolescents may be due to a wide number of congenital or developmental pathologies, such as avascular necrosis (AVN) Legg-CalvèPerthes disease (LCPD), slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) [1]. Despite a plethora of “hip preserving” surgical procedures have been developed in recent decades, joint salvage may be an unsatisfying solution in the case of end-stage degenerative hip disease, with severe pain, disability and overall decreased quality of life [2,3,4]. Total hip replacement (THR) is a safe and effective option for treating end-stage hip osteoarthritis in adults, but concerns arise when this solution is considered for children and adolescents. The few studies about pediatric THR are generally small case series with limited follow-ups, sometimes including children treated for malignancies and obsolete implants/bearings [11,12,13]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call