Abstract
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) offers a more conservative treatment than total knee arthroplasty when osteoarthritis affects only one tibiofemoral knee compartment. Cemented UKA has become the gold standard due to its good functional outcomes and low revision rates. The most common reasons for revision with cemented UKA include aseptic loosing, unexplained pain, and radiolucent lines. Cementless UKA, which adds a porous coating of titanium and hydroxyapatite as well as an additional peg on the femoral component, has been shown to reduce the prevalence of radiolucencies compared to cemented UKAs. National registry data have demonstrated comparable functional outcomes and improved revision rates with cementless UKA. This review aims to summarize various advancements in unicompartmental prostheses, and to highlight how the conceptual advantages of the cementless model leads to superior implant survivorship and functional outcomes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
