Cemented Versus Cementless Femoral Fixation for Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Osteoarthritis

Abstract

BackgroundThe mode of femoral fixation for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is undetermined, with reported outcomes favoring different fixation methods. This study aimed to compare postoperative complications between cemented and cementless fixation at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years in patients aged 65 years of age and older undergoing THA for osteoarthritis. MethodsUsing an all-payer, national database, patients 65 years and older undergoing primary THA, either with cementless (n = 56,701) or cemented (n = 6,283) femoral fixation for osteoarthritis were identified. A 1:1 propensity-matched analysis for age, sex, comorbidity index, alcohol abuse, tobacco use, obesity, and diabetes was performed, resulting in n = 6,283 patients in each cohort. Postoperative outcomes, including postoperative periprosthetic joint infection, aseptic revision, surgical site infection, pulmonary embolism, venous thromboembolism, wound complications, dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, and aseptic loosening were assessed. ResultsThe cemented cohort had higher rates of infection (4.5 versus 0.8%, odds ratio [OR] 5.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.33 to 7.93, P < .001), aseptic revision (2.9 versus 2.0%, OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.85, P = .001), venous thromboembolism (1.8 versus 1.3%, OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.87, P < .001), and aseptic loosening (1.5 versus 0.7%, OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.60 to 3.32, P < .001) at 90-days. At 1 and 2 years, the cemented cohort had higher rates of infection, aseptic revision, and aseptic loosening (all P < .001). Rates of periprosthetic fracture were similar at all time points (all P < .001). ConclusionsCemented fixation had higher rates of infection, aseptic loosening, and aseptic revision. This finding supports the current use of cementless fixation, but the ultimate decision regarding fixation type should be based on the proper optimization of the patient’s comorbidities and bone quality.