Cemented Glenohumeral Fixation: Standard of Care—Affirms

Abstract

Cemented humeral stem fixation in shoulder joint arthroplasty has been, and continues to be the “gold standard” to ensure satisfactory implant orientation and stability. The most commonly performed type of shoulder arthroplasty is hemi-arthroplasty in the face of comminuted fracture. Appropriate stem height and version relative to the glenoid is paramount in obtaining a satisfactory result. This has been proven to be reliably reproducible through cement fixation of the stem with careful reattachment of the tuberosities. Total shoulder arthroplasty in rheumatoid patients with questionable bone stock likewise has relied upon “cementation” of the humeral component to ensure secure fixation, prevent loosening and avoid subsidence. In younger patients it is tempting to want to avoid cement in the proximal humerus, nonetheless most studies have demonstrated loosening of the humeral component not to be problematic once cement has been used. In addition, newer modular componentry allows head removal (without stem removal) providing ready access to the glenoid should glenoid revision be needed. The ability to add antibiotics within the cement mantle in high-risk patients additionally affords an advantage in treating and/or avoiding infection. Survivorship studies have not demonstrated any advantage of cementless versus cement fixation of the humeral component in shoulder arthroplasty. Temporizing techniques such as cup arthroplasty and hybrid techniques such as placing tantalum weave surfaces proximally for enhanced tuberosity fixation may have a role, but do not replace the long-standing efficacy of cement fixation of the humeral component in the vast majority of patients requiring shoulder arthroplasty.