Abstract
The extracellular matrix plays an important role in growth factor biology, serving as a potential platform for rapid growth factor mobilization or a sink for concentrated sequestration. We now demonstrate that when a growth factor binds reversibly to the matrix, its effects are augmented by this interaction, and when the factor is absorbed irreversibly to the extracellular matrix, it becomes sequestered. These findings call into question the notion that all growth factors are best presented to cells and tissues in a sustained and controlled fashion. In our studies, we examined basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) release kinetics from synthetically fabricated microsphere devices and naturally synthesized extracellular matrix. While the sustained release of bFGF was up to 3.0-fold more potent at increasing vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cell proliferation than bolus administration, the reverse was true for TGF-beta1. A bolus of TGF-beta1 inhibited vascular cells up to 3.8-fold more efficiently than the same amount of TGF-beta1 if control-released. Both growth factors bound to the extracellular matrix, but only bFGF was released in a controlled fashion (2.8%/day). Contact with the extracellular matrix and subsequent release enhanced bFGF activity such that it was 86% more effective at increasing smooth muscle cell numbers than equal amounts of growth factor diluted from frozen stock. TGF-beta1 remained tightly adherent. The small amount of TGF-beta1 released from the extracellular matrix was approximately 30% less effective than bolus administration at inhibiting vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cell growth. Sustained growth factor release may be the preferable mode of administration, but only when a similar mode of metabolism is utilized endogenously.
Highlights
The extracellular matrix is an integral part of growth factor biology
That while the sustained release of Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) was up to 3.0-fold more potent at increasing vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cell proliferation than bolus administration, the reverse was true for transforming growth factor-1 (TGF-1)
Two different devices were used because TGF-1 is not significantly heparin-binding [42], and bFGF is denatured by the methylene chloride [18, 22] required to solvent-cast Ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer (EVAc) release devices [40]
Summary
The extracellular matrix is an integral part of growth factor biology. Many growth factors bind to this substrate, and it has been postulated that the matrix serves as a sequestration site from which growth factor stores can be concentrated for enhanced local action or released for heightened overall effect [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. We (16 –18) and others (19 –21) have demonstrated profound biologic effects of bFGF when control-released to cells in culture or tissues in vivo These findings have been extended to matrix-binding growth factors, and it is well documented that cells optimally respond to the controlled release of growth factors [18, 22, 23]. Reports of growth factor physiology often compare bFGF and TGF-1, for together they possess the fullest range of biochemical and biophysical parameters at opposite ends of the spectrum of biologic effects [24, 25] They both have short in vivo half-lives of Ͻ30 min (26 –28) and yet have profound and sustained mediation of angiogenesis (29 –32), gene expression [33,34,35], and extracellular matrix accumulation (36 –39). A more precise understanding of the relationship between the matrix and growth factors will aid in the design of formulations for therapeutics, but will lead to an unveiling of a more definite pathophysiology of the diseases that growth factors govern
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
PubMed Scopus
Endothelial Cells
Google Scholar
Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium
Smooth Muscle
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
The American Journal of Pathology
Jan 1, 2006
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Mar 1, 1995
The American Journal of Pathology
Jul 1, 1998
The American Journal of Pathology
Feb 1, 2001
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Sep 1, 1997
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Sep 1, 2005
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Jun 1, 2007
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Apr 1, 1998
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Mar 1, 1997
Journal of Biological Chemistry
May 1, 2003
Molecular Therapy
Feb 1, 2011
The American Journal of Pathology
Mar 1, 2002
The American Journal of Pathology
Mar 1, 1999
Journal of Hepatology
May 1, 2001
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Nov 1, 2023
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Nov 1, 2023
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Nov 1, 2023
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Nov 1, 2023
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Nov 1, 2023
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Nov 1, 2023
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Nov 1, 2023
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Nov 1, 2023
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Nov 1, 2023
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Nov 1, 2023