Abstract

Simple SummaryColorectal cancer (CRC) causes a high number (more than 800,000) of deaths worldwide each year. Better methods for early diagnosis and the development of strategies to enhance the efficacy of the therapeutic approaches used to complement or substitute surgical removal of the tumor are urgently needed. Currently available pharmacological armamentarium provides very moderate benefits to patients due to the high resistance of tumor cells to respond to anticancer drugs. The present review summarizes and classifies into seven groups the cellular and molecular mechanisms of chemoresistance (MOC) accounting for the failure of CRC response to the pharmacological treatment.The unsatisfactory response of colorectal cancer (CRC) to pharmacological treatment contributes to the substantial global health burden caused by this disease. Over the last few decades, CRC has become the cause of more than 800,000 deaths per year. The reason is a combination of two factors: (i) the late cancer detection, which is being partially solved by the implementation of mass screening of adults over age 50, permitting earlier diagnosis and treatment; (ii) the inadequate response of advanced unresectable tumors (i.e., stages III and IV) to pharmacological therapy. The latter is due to the existence of complex mechanisms of chemoresistance (MOCs) that interact and synergize with each other, rendering CRC cells strongly refractory to the available pharmacological regimens based on conventional chemotherapy, such as pyrimidine analogs (5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, trifluridine, and tipiracil), oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, as well as drugs targeted toward tyrosine kinase receptors (regorafenib, aflibercept, bevacizumab, cetuximab, panitumumab, and ramucirumab), and, more recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab, ipilimumab, and pembrolizumab). In the present review, we have inventoried the genes involved in the lack of CRC response to pharmacological treatment, classifying them into seven groups (from MOC-1 to MOC-7) according to functional criteria to identify cancer cell weaknesses. This classification will be useful to pave the way for developing sensitizing tools consisting of (i) new agents to be co-administered with the active drug; (ii) pharmacological approaches, such as drug encapsulation (e.g., into labeled liposomes or exosomes); (iii) gene therapy interventions aimed at restoring the impaired function of some proteins (e.g., uptake transporters and tumor suppressors) or abolishing that of others (such as export pumps and oncogenes).

Highlights

  • Data collected in 2018 by the Global Cancer Observatory (GCO, https://gco.iarc.fr), supported by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the World Health Organization (WHO), revealed that colorectal cancer (CRC) constitutes a severe health burden, causing substantial mortality and morbidity worldwide

  • Several studies have suggested that OCT3 levels (SLC22A3) are reduced in intestinal tumors [32,33], which may be involved in the lack of response found in clinical practice in the treatment of other digestive tumors using irinotecan, cisplatin, and several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as imatinib [37,38]

  • Polymorphisms c.34G > A and c.421C > A affecting the ABCG2 gene, encoding the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), in combination with those found in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), may be useful to select oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, such as FOLFOX and XELOX versus FOLFIRI, in patients with metastatic CRC [66]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Data collected in 2018 by the Global Cancer Observatory (GCO, https://gco.iarc.fr), supported by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the World Health Organization (WHO), revealed that colorectal cancer (CRC) constitutes a severe health burden, causing substantial mortality and morbidity worldwide. Transport activity; for the latter, this is the case in metastatic CRC patients, where it is used as a Patients with the SLCO1B1*15 polymorphism showed higher systemic exposure and lower clearance palliative treatment. Several studies have suggested that OCT3 levels (SLC22A3) are reduced in intestinal tumors [32,33], which may be involved in the lack of response found in clinical practice in the treatment of other digestive tumors using irinotecan, cisplatin, and several TKIs, such as imatinib [37,38]. Carriers of the SLC19 family are involved in methotrexate uptake in vitro [30] Their decreased expression has been associated with enhanced resistance to this drug in CRC tumors [30]. Studies regarding 5-FU, irinotecan, and its active metabolite SN-38 may point to a possible role of these pumps in their response to chemotherapy in CRC patients, in vivo studies to support development of these proteins as targets for therapy are needed [30,56,57,58,59]

Impaired expression
Reduced sensitivity in vitro and poor clinical prognosis *
Worse outcome *
Defective MMR
Increased activity
Fusobacterium nucleatum
Survival Pathways
Findings
Conclusions and Perspectives

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.