Abstract

Insects that transmit many of the world’s deadliest animal diseases, for instance trypanosomosis, find their suitable hosts and avoid non-preferred hosts mostly through olfactory cues. The waterbuck repellent blend (WRB) comprising geranylacetone, guaiacol, pentanoic acid, and δ-octalactone derived from waterbuck skin odor is a repellent to some savannah-adapted tsetse flies and reduces trap catches of riverine species. However, the cellular and molecular mechanisms associated with detection and coding of the repellent odors remain to be elucidated. Here, we demonstrated that WRB inhibited blood feeding in both Glossina pallidipes Austen, 1903 and Glossina fuscipes fuscipes Newstead, 1910. Using the DREAM (Deorphanization of Receptors based on Expression Alterations in odorant receptor mRNA levels) technique, combined with ortholog comparison and molecular docking, we predicted the putative odorant receptors (ORs) for the WRB in G. f. fuscipes, a non-model insect. We show that exposure of G. f. fuscipes in vivo to WRB odorant resulted in up- and downregulation of mRNA transcript of several ORs. The WRB component with strong feeding inhibition altered mRNA transcript differently as compared to an attractant odor, showing these two odors of opposing valence already segregate at the cellular and molecular levels. Furthermore, molecular dynamics simulations demonstrated that the predicted ligand–OR binding pockets consisted mostly of hydrophobic residues with a few hydrogen bonds but a stable interaction. Finally, our electrophysiological response showed the olfactory sensory neurons of G. f. fuscipes tuned to the tsetse repellent components in different sensitivity and selectivity.

Highlights

  • Blood-feeding insects such as tsetse flies have a differential feeding preference to some animals over others regardless of their abundance (Weitz, 1963)

  • We found that the feeding behavior was significantly inhibited in G. pallidipes relative to the control

  • Removal of pentanoic acid or δ-octalactone significantly reduced the antifeeding effect in this tsetse fly species compared to the antifeedant activity elicited by the full blend

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Blood-feeding insects such as tsetse flies have a differential feeding preference to some animals over others regardless of their abundance (Weitz, 1963) Such behavior is a response to odors and can lead to the identification of attractants and repellents for vector control. The spatial repellent for some tsetse fly species is a blend of semiochemicals formulated to prevent tsetse flies from encountering a livestock host from distance, identified from a non-host, waterbuck (Kobus defasa) (Gikonyo et al, 2002, 2003; Mwangi et al, 2008). Recent research on tsetse genomes has opened new opportunities to make functional characterization of Glossina odorant receptors (ORs) possible (Aksoy et al, 2014; Obiero et al, 2014 Watanabe et al, 2014; Macharia et al, 2016; Attardo et al, 2019)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call