Abstract

A systematic comparison was undertaken of the respective abilities of normal chicken embryo fibroblast (CEF) cells, Rous sarcoma virus (RSV)- transformed CEF cells, avian Rous sarcoma (RS) tumor cells and murine RS cells to serve as targets and antigen donors in various assays for the detection of cellular and humoral anti-tumor immunity in chickens bearing tumors induced by Rous sarcoma virus. As measured by a cytotoxicity procedure, avian and murine RS cells were more susceptible to the killing effects of sensitized lymphocytes than were transformed CEF which in turn were more reactive than normal CEF. In contrast, sera from tumor-bearing animals were able to stain by indirect immunofluorescence only the avian RS and transformed CEF cell types. Extracts of both transformed CEF cells and avian RS cells but not normal CEF were equally effective as inhibitors of migration of peritoneal exudate cells derived from tumor-bearing animals. Transformed CEF were found to produce far higher quantities of transforming virus progeny than avian RS cells, although the latter were apparently albe to synthesize defective viral particles. These data indicate the significant variations which may occur under experimental conditions, depending on the types of assays and target cells employed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call