Abstract

Understanding cell migration in a 3D microenvironment is essential as most cells encounter complex 3D extracellular matrix (ECM) in vivo. Although interactions between cells and ECM have been studied previously on 2D surfaces, cell migration studies in 3D environment are still limited. To investigate cell migration under various degrees of confinements and coating conditions, 3D platforms with micropost arrays and controlled fibronectin (FN) protein coating were developed. MC3T3-E1 cells spread and contacted the top surface of microposts if FN was coated on top. When FN was coated all over the microposts, cells were trapped between microposts with 3 μm spacing and barely moved. As the spacing between microposts increased from 3 to 5 μm, cells became elongated with limited cell movement of 0.18 μm/min, slower than the cell migration speed of 0.40 μm/min when cells moved on top. When cells were trapped in between the microposts, cell nuclei were distorted and actin filaments formed along the sidewalls of microposts. With the addition of a top cover to introduce cell confinement, the cell migration speed was 0.23 and 0.84 μm/min when the channel height was reduced from 20 to 10 μm, respectively. Cell traction force was monitored at on the top and bottom microposts with 10 μm channel height. These results show that the MC3T3-E1 cell morphology, migration speed, and movement position were affected by surface coating and physical confinement, which will provide significant insights for in vivo cell migration within a 3D ECM.

Highlights

  • Cells encounter complex 3D extracellular matrix (ECM) in vivo

  • Different cell migration mechanisms are expected as cells move in 3D confined ECM compared with 2D flat surface [2,11]

  • To mimic cell movement in a 3D microenvironment, cell migration was compared between cells moving on top and in between microposts

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Movement of cells is affected by the ECM surface properties and physical confinement [1,2,3]. The collective migration of epithelial and endothelial cells in capillary-like 3D structures initiates tissue development [4]. Neutrophil cells need to squeeze through cellular layers to enter the inflammatory area [5]. Cells behave differently during migration in a 3D confined microenvironment. The migration mode of cells switched from mesenchymal to amoeboid fashion as cells migrated in highly confined and low-adhesive ECM [10]. Different cell migration mechanisms are expected as cells move in 3D confined ECM compared with 2D flat surface [2,11]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call