Abstract

BackgroundAnnual killifishes are adapted to surviving and reproducing over alternating dry and wet seasons. During the dry season, all adults die and desiccation-resistant embryos remain encased in dry mud for months or years in a state of diapause where their development is halted in anticipation of the months that have to elapse before their habitats are flooded again. Embryonic development of annual killifishes deviates from canonical teleost development. Epiblast cells disperse during epiboly, and a “dispersed phase” precedes gastrulation. In addition, annual fish have the ability to enter diapause and block embryonic development at the dispersed phase (diapause I), mid-somitogenesis (diapause II) and the final phase of development (diapause III). Developmental transitions associated with diapause entry and exit can be linked with cell cycle events. Here we set to image this transition in living embryos.ResultsTo visibly explore cell cycle dynamics during killifish development in depth, we created a stable transgenic line in Nothobranchius furzeri that expresses two fluorescent reporters, one for the G1 phase and one for the S/G2 phases of the cell cycle, respectively (Fluorescent Ubiquitination-based Cell Cycle Indicator, FUCCI). Using this tool, we observed that, during epiboly, epiblast cells progressively become quiescent and exit the cell cycle. All embryos transit through a phase where dispersed cells migrate, without showing any mitotic activity, possibly blocked in the G1 phase (diapause I). Thereafter, exit from diapause I is synchronous and cells enter directly into the S phase without transiting through G1. The developmental trajectories of embryos entering diapause and of those that continue to develop are different. In particular, embryos entering diapause have reduced growth along the medio-lateral axis. Finally, exit from diapause II is synchronous for all cells and is characterized by a burst of mitotic activity and growth along the medio-lateral axis such that, by the end of this phase, the morphology of the embryos is identical to that of direct-developing embryos.ConclusionsOur study reveals surprising levels of coordination of cellular dynamics during diapause and provides a reference framework for further developmental analyses of this remarkable developmental quiescent state.

Highlights

  • Annual killifishes are adapted to surviving and reproducing over alternating dry and wet seasons

  • Two different Fluorescence Ubiquitination-based Cell Cycle Indicator (FUCCI) transgenic lines were successfully generated using the Tol2 transgenesis system [42,43,44]: (i) a “FUCCI green” reporter (Azami-Green—Geminin), which is activated during the S/G2/M phase of the cell cycle [40] and (ii) a “FUCCI red” reporter (KusabiraOrange—Cdt1), which is activated during the G1 phase of the cell cycle [40]

  • We focus on a subset of these stages and, more precisely, we describe development from stage 19 to 33, which correspond to the phase between completion of epiboly and beginning of the dispersed phase to an advanced stage of somitogenesis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Annual killifishes are adapted to surviving and reproducing over alternating dry and wet seasons. As an adaptation to seasonal water availability, embryonic development of annual killifishes deviates from canonical teleost development for three main distinctive traits. The embryo at the end of epiboly consists only of extraembryonic structures and separated epiblast cells that migrate randomly over the yolk surface in a unique developmental stage named dispersed phase [6]. The dispersed phase can last for several days, and the embryonic axis is formed by migration of the epiblast cells towards a point where they reaggregate and form the embryonic primordium This peculiar stage is named reaggregation phase [6]. In annual killifishes the formation of the three embryonic layers, which happens during gastrulation, takes place after epiboly during the late aggregation phase as demonstrated by live cell imaging and by the expression of the blastopore markers goosecoid and brachyury [9]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call