Abstract
Celebrating the quality of our referees.
Highlights
One of the key strengths of The Journal of Physiology is the integrity of our referees and the quality of their reports
This is a brief overview of the refereeing process, by way of encouragement to young researchers to get involved and as a ‘thank you’ to all of the many referees that contribute to reviewing manuscripts submitted to The Journal
What makes a good referee? The answer depends on which side of the Peer Review System you happen to be sitting when the question is posed: as an author having just submitted your best physiological research we all have a tendency to consider a ‘good’ referee as ‘anyone that recommends acceptance of our MS’! On the other hand, we are research connoisseurs, excited by the novel concept or insight we gain from reading and understanding the work of our colleagues
Summary
One of the key strengths of The Journal of Physiology is the integrity of our referees and the quality of their reports. This is a brief overview of the refereeing process, by way of encouragement to young researchers to get involved and as a ‘thank you’ to all of the many referees that contribute to reviewing manuscripts submitted to The Journal.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
