Abstract
Despite the advancement in technology, historic cut-offs of <0.5mV for dense scar and 0.5-1.5mV for scar borderzone continue to be used in contemporary electrophysiology. Modern multipolar mapping catheters employ smaller electrodes and interelectrode spacing that theoretically allows for mapping with increased resolution and reduced far-field electrogram (EGM) component. We aimed to assess the optimal voltage cut-offs for ventricular scar substrate characterization using HD Grid multipolar mapping catheter against cardiac MRI-derived scar. We compared optimal voltage cut-offs using conventional bipolar sampling,Best Duplicate Algorithm and HD wave solution plus best duplicate algorithm on. A multicenter study of 33 patients with ischaemic heart disease undergoing VT ablation. Substrate mapping was performed using the high-density HD-grid multipolar mapping catheter. Bipolar voltage maps were co-registered with cardiac MRI/CT obtained before the procedure to assess the voltage characteristics of the scar defined by the image. Pre-procedure contrast-enhanced MRI data were analysed using ADAS software (Galgo medical). Data points were collected in regions of scar during (1) HD wave mapping with best duplicate algorithm on(Waveon), (2) Mapping with HD wave off and best duplicate on (Waveoff) and (3) with conventional bipolar mapping (Alloff). 29,633 voltage points were analyzed and compared to their location with the fused MRI voltage map. The median bipolar voltage for regions of dense MRI/CT scar using (Waveon) HD wave solution and best duplicate algorithm was 0.24mV (IQR 0.12 – 0.43). The median voltage with (Waveoff) HD wave off was 0.29mV (0.15 – 0.45). The median voltage with (Alloff) HD wave off and best duplicate off was 0.32mV (0.19 – 0.5). ROC analysis using AUC suggested the optimal cut-off for endocardial dense scar using (Waveon) HD wave mapping and best duplicate algorithm was 0.31mV (sensitivity: 69.6%, specificity: 60.74%) (Figure), (Waveoff) cut-off with the best duplicate and without the HD wave mapping was 0.34mV (sensitivity: 88.0%, specificity: 42.96%) and (Alloff) without wave mapping or best duplication was 0.36mV (sensitivity: 84%, specificity: 52%). Ventricular substrate characterization with newer mapping technology using narrow electrode spacing and smaller electrode sizes suggests that traditional voltage cut-offs may need revision. The optimal cut-off for dense scar delineation with the HD Grid and wave technology is 0.31mV.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
