Abstract

CD80 and CD86 are expressed on antigen presenting cells and are required to engage their shared receptor, CD28, for the costimulation of CD4 T cells. It is unclear why two stimulatory ligands with overlapping roles have evolved. CD80 and CD86 also bind the regulatory molecule CTLA-4. We explored the role of CD80 and CD86 in the homeostasis and proliferation of CD4+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg), which constitutively express high levels of CTLA-4 yet are critically dependent upon CD28 signals. We observed that CD86 was the dominant ligand for Treg proliferation, survival, and maintenance of a regulatory phenotype, with higher expression of CTLA-4, ICOS, and OX40. We also explored whether CD80-CD28 interactions were specifically compromised by CTLA-4 and found that antibody blockade, clinical deficiency of CTLA-4 and CRISPR-Cas9 deletion of CTLA-4 all improved Treg survival following CD80 stimulation. Taken together, our data suggest that CD86 is the dominant costimulatory ligand for Treg homeostasis, despite its lower affinity for CD28, because CD80-CD28 interactions are selectively impaired by the high levels of CTLA-4. These data suggest a cell intrinsic role for CTLA-4 in regulating CD28 costimulation by direct competition for CD80, and indicate that that CD80 and CD86 have discrete roles in CD28 costimulation of CD4 T cells in the presence of high levels of CTLA-4.

Highlights

  • Costimulatory signals, in addition to T cell receptor (TCR) engagement, are essential for T cell survival, expansion and acquisition of effector functions [1]

  • CD28 costimulation is essential for Treg development, homeostasis and proliferation and is the outcome of four competing ligand-receptor interactions: CD80-CD28, CD86CD28, CD80-CTLA-4, and CD86-CTLA-4

  • Since Treg constitutively express CTLA4, which has greater affinity for CD80 and CD86 than CD28, we sought to determine whether Treg might be a useful cell system in which to distinguish the capabilities of the two ligands

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Costimulatory signals, in addition to T cell receptor (TCR) engagement, are essential for T cell survival, expansion and acquisition of effector functions [1]. Deficiency of either ligand alone in mice produces a mild phenotype with modest reductions in T cell costimulation but normal CD4 T cell frequencies and immunoglobulin levels [9, 10] suggesting that they can compensate for each other. These limited functional differences have led to the general perception that CD80 and CD86 have overlapping or possibly redundant roles [8, 9]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call