CD1a is not effective in distinguishing calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumors from amyloid-rich central odontogenic fibroma

Abstract

Differential diagnosis between the non-calcifying variant of calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor (NCLC-CEOT) and amyloid-rich central odontogenic fibroma (AR-COdF) has become a debate, particularly regarding the frequency of CD1a positivity in both entities. This has led to the growing consensus that CD1a-positive staining in AR-NC lesions confirms the diagnosis of AR-COdF. Here, we assess the validity of this consensus. We collected the data of a case series of histopathologically distinct CEOTs, NCLC-CEOTs, and COdFs and stained them for CD1a and amyloid. Of the 9 CEOTs and NCLC-CEOTs, we diagnosed 4 as classic, 3 as associated with a dentigerous cyst, and 2 as combined CEOT/adenomatoid odontogenic tumors. Of the 9 COdFs, we diagnosed 3 as epithelial poor, 3 as epithelial rich (lacking amyloid), 2 as hyalinized with amyloid, and 1 as hyalinized without amyloid and assessed the staining results. Of the 9 CEOTs and NCLC-CEOTs, 7 stained positively for CD1a, 5 diffusely and 2 focally. Notably, 2 classic NCLC-CEOTs stained strongly CD1a positive. All 3 of the epithelial-poor COdFs were predictably CD1a negative. Of the 6 remaining COdFs, 2 were CD1a positive, 1 hyalinized-with-amyloid COdF diffusely and 1 epithelial-rich-without amyloid focally. CD1a positivity, which occurs in classic CEOT and NCLC-CEOT, does not help distinguish between NCLC-CEOT and AR-COdF and is inconsistent in all AR-COdFs. The diagnosis of CEOT and AR-COdF should be guided by appropriate histopathologic criteria irrespective of CD1a staining or the presence of amyloid or calcifications.