Abstract
In Brief Objective A randomised controlled trial to determine the acceptability to dentists and patients of cavity preparation with an Erbium:YAG laser as compared with conventional handpieces. Methods Fifteen dentists (9 GDPs, 1 community dentist and 5 hospital dentists) treated 77 patients (age range 3.5–68 years old) who had two matched cavities, in a split mouth, randomised trial. One cavity was prepared conventionally, the other with the laser, with dentist and patient preference determined by questionnaire. Results In the majority of cases, where dentists expressed a preference, it was for conventional cavity preparation, and this was significant (p < 0.001). In more than half of the laser appointments, dentists had to use conventional handpieces to complete the cavity. Principle difficulties reported with the laser were access (25 cases) and slow speed of cutting (11 cases). Patients aged ≥10 years who expressed a preference, preferred laser treatment, and this was significant (p < 0.001). Patients aged <10 years, assessed using a simplified pictorial questionnaire, did not show a significant preference for either technique. Conclusions Dentists preferred conventional handpieces for cavity preparation while patients aged ≥10 years old preferred laser treatment. Patients <10 years old did not express a preference.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.