Abstract
Residential home (that is, housing) inspection has been a growth industry in Canada and the United States since its emergence in the 1970s. Within a legal context where the purchase of used housing is governed by the doctrine of caveat emptor, and a political and economic context characterized by prudentialism, home inspection appears to offer a means by which consumers can discharge their legal and political duty to be prudent. However, in Canada, because home inspection is largely unregulated and market driven, consumers of pre-owned housing are placed at a structural disadvantage relative to home inspectors. This article argues that we should be cautious of embracing private residential home inspection as an adequate consumer protection mechanism or form of risk consulting because there are fundamental and irreconcilable differences between a public service that strives to meet the objective of the public good and home inspection as a private service offered for public consumption that strives to meet the objectives of private interests.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
