Abstract
The work of Constantine Cavafy and that of E.M. Forster are marked as much by difference as by similarity. The similarities derive largely from their shared tradition of Western Hellenism. The differences stem from their dissenting views over the evolution of Hellenism and its survival into the Hellenistic and Byzantine periods. Forster's hostility to Christianity and his Gibbonesque view of Byzantine culture were in marked contrast to Cavafy's view of Byzantium. In this light, Cavafy's final unfinished poems reflect a curious nostalgia and may be read as a subtle refutation of Forster. The Asia Minor Catastrophe further complicated their relationship. Despite his efforts to promote Cavafy, Forster showed great indiscretion by soliciting for his translation project the assistance of Arnold Toynbee, who had resigned from the Koraes Chair amidst controversy. Forster's own pro-Turkish stance undoubtedly alarmed Cavafy and caused him to be less than forthright in granting Forster publishing rights. Their literary friendship was greatly affected by the political events of the Balkans.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.