Abstract
This research article investigates the causes and consequences of municipal institutional arrangements for the provision of resilient critical infrastructure in municipalities. The study explains how the municipal organizational robustness and external institutional dynamics moderate the relation between capacities, leadership, and local government investment decisions. We examine hypotheses on moderating effects with regression methods, using data from 345 Chilean municipalities over a nine-year period, and analyzing the evidence with support of qualitative data. Our results reveal that municipal organizational robustness—operational rules, planning, managerial flexibility and integration, and accountability—is the most quantitatively outstanding moderating factor. The evidence leads us to deduce that efforts to support local governments in the emerging policy domain of resilient critical infrastructure require special attention to the robustness of municipal institutional arrangements. The results are valid for countries where the local governments have responsibilities to fulfill and their decisions have consequences for the adaptation. Since one of the objectives of the Special Issue “Bringing Governance Back Home—Lessons for Local Government Regarding Rapid Climate Action” is to explore how action is enabled or constrained by institutional relations in which the actors are embedded, this study contributes to achieving the goal.
Highlights
Capacities and leadership are important ingredients of effective local government responses to frequent disasters and climate change [1,2,3], but how are the capacities and leadership translated into decisions and adaptation outcomes? To address this research question, this study investigated the causes and consequences of municipal institutional arrangements and governance relationships in shaping local government decisions to reduce risk and adapt to extreme weather events through investment in resilient critical infrastructure
We summarize some of the challenges of our study “Causes and Consequences of Local Government Efforts to Reduce Risk and Adapt to Extreme Weather
Seeking to enhance understanding of how organizational capacities and political dimensions of mayoral leadership are translated into decisions, this study realized as a starting point that capacities and underpinning factors for mayoral leadership may explain local government decisions concerning Investment
Summary
To address this research question, this study investigated the causes and consequences of municipal institutional arrangements and governance relationships in shaping local government decisions to reduce risk and adapt to extreme weather events through investment in resilient critical infrastructure. While numerous previous studies have pointed out that local institutional arrangements are often important determinants of adaptation performance, and our previous work has helped identify several relevant factors [4], this research contributes more specific knowledge about how municipal organizational dynamics matter. Local governments play an important role in DRR, mitigation, adaptation, and sustainable development in terms of Investment and Maintenance [3,13,16]. The local government decisions and outcomes are shaped by complex situations—biophysical, social, and institutional dynamics—that give rise to uncertainties, incentives, and opportunity costs [3,17,18]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have