Abstract

PurposeThis study has two aims: first, propose the use of the driver-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) framework to expand the normal focus of impact pathways in social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) on endpoint impacts to a systematic analysis to find links between the main sources of social issues and impacts; second, develop a new impact assessment method to quantify the lifetime health and economic outcomes associated with social subcategories, for the first time, using decision analytic models.MethodsThe DPSIR framework is mapped to the corresponding elements of the S-LCA context in relation to the social subcategories defined in the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets. Next, a more robust approach is developed for cause-impact chains between social subcategories and impacts on human well-being based on decision-analytic models (decision trees and Markov models) using healthcare approaches and data. Finally, the health and economic consequences associated with social subcategories are quantified by using Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) and costs based on medical literature and healthcare studies.Results and discussionThe method was applied to the “working hours” social subcategory in Canada. The cause-effect chain is built using DPSIR framework in relation to the current social issue in Canada of working more than standard hours. Results of the decision analytic model show that working standard hours is more effective and cost-saving than working more than standard hours from the Canadian healthcare perspective. Working standard hours compared to more than standard hours led to an increase of 0.73 QALY and decrease in cost of $6702 per worker. Based on an estimated 2.4 million Canadian workers working more than standard hours, this resulted in a total gain of 1.7 million QALYs and saving of $16 billion overall. Using cost-effectiveness analysis, possible interventions at multiple entry points of the cause-effect chain within DPSIR framework are proposed to reduce the negative health impacts and associated costs of working more than standard hours in Canada.ConclusionsApplying the method on other subcategories could help decision-makers establish the cause-effect aspects of the social performance of their product systems using a quantitative systematic analysis from a life cycle perspective. This approach supports corporate decision-makers to quantify social impacts associated with their product supply chains by calculating QALYs and healthcare costs of their socio-economic conditions enabling them to identify possible interventions to improve the social performance.

Highlights

  • Social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) was the last tool to be developed within the framework of life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA)

  • In 2009, guidelines for S-LCA were introduced by UNEP/SETAC, while developing S-LCA based on ISO 14,040 framework similar to Environmental life cycle assessment (E-LCA)

  • The results show that working standard hours has led to 34.69 Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) with CAD $495,155 cost per worker while working more than standard hours has led to 33.96 QALYs with CAD$501,857 cost per worker

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) was the last tool to be developed within the framework of life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA). It is crucial to expand system boundaries of current impact pathways to a more systematic approach, investigating the links between main sources of social issues and impacts thereby identifying underlying causes at different points in the cause-effect chain and providing multiple entry points for intervention This expansion will help to achieve the aim of S-LCA to support decision-makers to develop effective solutions that improve the social performance of product systems (UNEP/ SETAC 2009). Another challenge in current type II S-LCIA approaches is the focus on impacts at macro-level scale; for example, the impact of gross domestic product per capita or income inequality on life expectancy or child mortality rate (Feschet et al 2012; Bocoum et al 2015) or productivity impact of missing governance (Weidema 2018). The lifetime health and economic outcomes associated with social subcategories will be quantified by developing a more robust impact pathway method building on Weidema (2006) using decision analytic models including decision trees and Markov models

Methods
Background
Application of DPSIR in S‐LCA context
Comparison with previous methods
Impact assessment method description
Application of method
QALYs and cost‐effectiveness analysis
Recommendations
Literature review
Discussion and conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.