Abstract

Causative-inchoative construction is a pair of verbs discussing the same notion, which is a state of change with a different form for each verb. It has been noted that causative-inchoative alternation constitutes a learnability problem for Arab EFL learners and very few studies addressed this language form among Arab learners and more specifically Jordanian learners of English. The present study is an attempt to measure the perception and production of English causative-inchoative alternations by learners whose native language is Arabic. In collecting the required data for the study, grammaticality judgement and correction task was used. A total of 24 Jordanian English majors partook in the study. Having analyzed the data statistically, the study results depicted that comprehending and producing causative and inchoative constructions by Jordanian English majors is not an easy task. It was also found that causative structures are more readily to acquire than their inchoative counterparts. More precisely, it could be argued that Jordanian learners of English acquire the causative form earlier than the inchoative form. Finally, the results revealed that language transfer is the driving force of acquiring causative-inchoative structures, where a great deal of errors can be traced back to Arabic. The study arrived at the conclusion that the participants have a weak competence of causative-inchoative forms which is best exhibited in their responses to the items of grammaticality judgement task. This conclusion could be attributed to the fact that Arabic and English vary greatly with respect to encoding causative-inchoative forms.

Highlights

  • The semantic relationship between a verb and its argument is represented in two ways; the first way is causative construction which implies that the agent is the subject and the patient is the object of the argument

  • The study arrived at the conclusion that the participants have a weak competence of causative-inchoative forms which is best exhibited in their responses to the items of grammaticality judgement task

  • Causative construction was employed 89 times when responding to the items of grammaticality judgement task, constituting 21.3% of total responses

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The semantic relationship between a verb and its argument is represented in two ways; the first way is causative construction which implies that the agent is the subject and the patient is the object of the argument. Causative- inchoative alternation is a pair of verbs expressing the same notion, mostly a state of change, each construction has a distinctive form. Causative verbs are counted as transitive in nature, expressing the notion of bringing about the change of state, whereas inchoative verbs are counted as the intransitive form, donating spontaneous change of state (Pinon, 2001). The so-called intransitive inchoative construction is characterized by the fact that, the object –verb semantic relationship is the same as that of subject-verb in the causative or transitive construction

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call