Abstract

Many have found attractive views according to which the veracity of specific causal judgements is underwritten by general causal laws. This paper describes various variants of that view and explores complications that appear when one looks at a certain simple type of example from physics. To capture certain causal dependencies, physics is driven to look at equations which, I argue, are not causal laws. One place where physics is forced to look at such equations (and not the only place) is in its handling of Green's functions which reveal point-wise causal dependencies. Thus, I claim that there is no simple relationship between causal dependence and causal laws of the sort often pictured. Rather, this paper explores the complexity of the relationship in a certain well-understood case. 1. Introduction2. The Causal Covering-Law Thesis3. The Laws of String Motion4. Green's Functions and Causation5. Green's Functions and Boundary Conditions6. The Green's Function as a Violation of the Wave Equation6.1. The Green's Function and other Senses of ‘Causal Law’: Temporal Propagation and Local Propagation7. The Distributional Wave Equation8. Why is not the Green's Function a ‘Causal Law’?9. Conclusion

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call