Abstract
Kargaly is one of the most important centers of mining and metallurgy in the great Eurasian steppe. Dr. E.N. Chernykh and his team (Institute of Archaeology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow) and various researchers at the CSIC and other Spanish institutions have developed a joint project to undertake a comprehensive study of the site's two main phases of occupation, the Bronze Age (2nd millenium BC) and the first Russian industrialization (1745-1900 AD). The Russian members of the joint team are in charge of the archaeological investigations, while the Spanish members are studying metallurgical and mining technology and production, on the one hand, and the environmental context and impact of these activities, on the other. This article presents the research design and first results of the Palaeoenvironmental research at Kargaly. This work has two aspects. The first consisted of obtaining one of the most complete palaeoenvironmental data sets from the steppes through both the systematic sampling of archaeological sites to recover charcoal, seeds, fruits and pollen and the taking of palynological cores from natural deposits, on the other Both sampling programs were supported by radiocarbon dates. The second aspect, to which the greater part of this article is devoted, was dedicated to contextualizing the palaeobotanical evidence by studying the present-day landscape, with particular attention to understanding the processes which shape the variability of the pollen rain. Our purpose was to obtain explicit and measurable calibrative criteria which would enable us to answer the palaeoenvironmental questions raised by our archaeological and archaeometallurgical research. These questions include, most importantly, the following: what was the extent of forest (the energy base for the mining/metallurgical complex) during the Bronze Age? and how do we evaluate subsistence practices? (an issue related to the origins of agriculture on the steppe). Answering both questions require us to go beyond conventional palaeoenvironmental practice, since they require very specific information about the past spatial distribution of vegetation on both local and regional scales. We propose a methodological perspective that places the practice of palynology in archaeology within the goals, theoretical premisses, and methods of Landscape Archaeology. Using this framework we evaluate and identify the limitation of conventional palaeoenvironmental practice (particularly the use of pollen analysis in archaeology) and we develop an intensive application of model-based approach to palynology, one that combines study of the pollen rain with mathematical modelling of the landscape. To put it into practice we used modern methods of terrestrial observation, such as satellite imagery, grounded in the use of Geo graphical Information Systems (GIS) and global positioning (GPS) technology.
Highlights
Is one of the most important centers of mining and metallurgy in the great Eurasian steppe
Our purpose was to obtain explicit and measurable calibrative criteria which would enable us to answer the palaeoenvironmental questions raised by our archaeological and archaeometallurgical research. These questions include, most importantly, thefollowing: what was the extent of forest during the Bronze Age? and how do we evaluate subsistence practices?
Answering both questions require us to go beyond conventional palaeoenvironmental practice, since they require very specific information about the past spatial distribution of vegetation on both local and regional scales
Summary
En este proyecto convergen tres de las líneas de investigación practicadas en el Dpto. de Prehistoria del Instituto de Historia (CSIC): la Arqueometalurgia, la Arqueología medio-ambiental y una Arqueología del paisaje que desarrolla técnicas avanzadas de investigación como el Sistema de Posicionamiento Global (1), los Sistema de Información Geográfica y la Teledetección espacial (Vicent, 1993a: 31-34; Chaparía///, 1998).A estas tres habría que añadir una cuarta línea importante: las relaciones con el Instituto deArqueología de Moscú (Academia Rusa de Ciencias)(Martínez Navarrete (coord.),1993; VV.AA, 1994) sostenidas, fundamentalmente, por las becas de intercambio entre dicha Academia y el CSIC. De Prehistoria del Instituto de Historia (CSIC): la Arqueometalurgia, la Arqueología medio-ambiental y una Arqueología del paisaje que desarrolla técnicas avanzadas de investigación como el Sistema de Posicionamiento Global (1), los Sistema de Información Geográfica y la Teledetección espacial (Vicent, 1993a: 31-34; Chaparía///, 1998).A estas tres habría que añadir una cuarta línea importante: las relaciones con el Instituto deArqueología de Moscú (Academia Rusa de Ciencias)(Martínez Navarrete (coord.),1993; VV.AA, 1994) sostenidas, fundamentalmente, por las becas de intercambio entre dicha Academia y el CSIC. (2) La diferente trasliteración del alfabeto cirílico al francés, inglés (Chernykh), alemán (Cernych) y español puede dificultar la identificación de sus publicaciones y dar lugar a errores como, en nuestro caso, optar por Chernij en vez de Chernyj (Presa (coord.), 1997). Dichas líneas se establecieron sobre el principio de su coordinación y complementariedad con las ya en marcha (5)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.