Abstract

In this study, we investigated the effects of tDCS over the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) during a visual working memory (WM) task, which probes different sources of response error underlying the precision of WM recall. In two separate experiments, we demonstrated that tDCS enhanced WM precision when applied bilaterally over the PPC, independent of electrode configuration. In a third experiment, we demonstrated with unilateral electrode configuration over the right PPC, that only cathodal tDCS enhanced WM precision and only when baseline performance was low. Looking at the effects on underlying sources of error, we found that cathodal stimulation enhanced the probability of correct target response across all participants by reducing feature-misbinding. Only for low-baseline performers, cathodal stimulation also reduced variability of recall. We conclude that cathodal- but not anodal tDCS can improve WM precision by preventing feature-misbinding and hereby enhancing attentional selection. For low-baseline performers, cathodal tDCS also protects the memory trace. Furthermore, stimulation over bilateral PPC is more potent than unilateral cathodal tDCS in enhancing general WM precision.

Highlights

  • Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation can be applied to interfere with ongoing neural activity and thereby obtain insight into underlying causal mechanisms of cognitive processes (de Graaf and Sack, 2014)

  • In the first two experiments, we tested the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on working memory (WM) precision and underlying sources of error, when applied bilaterally over the posterior parietal cortex (PPC, electrode equivalent P3 and P4)

  • We investigated the impact of parietal tDCS on the precision of visual working memory (WM) and potential underlying sources of error

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can be applied to interfere with ongoing neural activity and thereby obtain insight into underlying causal mechanisms of cognitive processes (de Graaf and Sack, 2014). The main effect of tDCS is thought to be the enhancement or suppression of local neural activity through respectively depolarising (anodal) or hyperpolarising (cathodal) the membrane potential (Nitsche et al, 2008). One reason for the observed variability of effects might be that cognitive processes rely on different underlying sub-mechanisms that may be differently affected by tDCS. Such a possibility highlights the need for sophisticated behavioural paradigms that can probe separate underlying mechanisms and permit testing how these are affected by different types of stimulation

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call