Catheter ablation vs medical management for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and metanalysis

Abstract

Abstract Background Current guidelines recommend a class IIa recommendation for catheter ablation in Atrial Fibrillation [AFIB]. Traditionally, catheter ablation has been known to be more effective in maintaining sinus rhythm than pharmacological management. However, there is sparse evidence to suggest that this translates to improved clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials to compare the efficacy of ablation vs medical management for AFIB in heart failure. Methods A systematic search was conducted for randomized trials from inception to Jan 2024 for studies comparing the outcomes of catheter ablation vs medical management for AFIB in heart failure. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular (CV) mortality, heart failure hospitalizations, change in LV ejection fraction (LVEF), AF recurrence rate, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), change in MLHFQ scores and cerebrovascular events. Random-effects models were used to calculate the pooled incidence, mean difference (MD), and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results A total of 10 RCTs with 2,348 patients were included in this study. Pulmonary vein isolation was the mainstay ablation strategy used. Compared with medical management, Ablation was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (RR- 0.61; 95% CI, 0.48-0.78; P<0.0001). Ablation was also associated with lower cardiovascular (CV) mortality (RR- 0.52; 95% CI, 0.36-0.75; P<0.0004), heart failure hospitalizations (RR- 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54-0.82; P<0.0001) and AF recurrence rate (RR- 0.43; 95% CI, 0.25-0.75; P<0.003). The study showed an improvement in LVEF (RR - 6.05; 95% CI, 3.35-8.75; P<0.0001), 6MWT (RR- 13.99; 95% CI, 4.18-23.81; P<0.005) and in MLHFQ score (RR -6.98; 95% CI, -12.03 to -1.93; P<0.007. There was a statistically significant difference between the 2 cohorts in the rates of cerebrovascular events (RR- 0.68; 95% CI, 0.35-1.30; P<0.24). Conclusion Randomized trials have shown clear benefits with catheter ablation compared to medical management for AFIB in heart failure. Ablation has demonstrated significantly lower all-cause mortality, reduced CV mortality, HF hospitalizations, AFIB recurrence rate, and improvement in LVEF. Patients who underwent catheter ablation showed improvement in functional outcomes like 6MWT and MLHFQ scores. There was no difference in the incidence of cerebrovascular events compared to medical management. This study adds to the growing evidence in the literature for ablation therapy; however, more trials are needed to identify patients for optimal benefits across the spectrum of heart failure patients.Forest PlotsForest Plots