Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Abstract

Abstract Background The prognostic impact of ventricular tachycardia (VT) catheter ablation is an important outstanding research question. Purpose We undertook a reconstructed individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing ablation to medical therapy in patients developing VT after myocardial infarction (MI). Methods We systematically identified all trials comparing catheter ablation to medical therapy in patients with VT and prior MI. The pre-specified primary endpoint was all-cause mortality assessed using reconstructed individual patient data obtained by digitisation of published Kaplan-Meier curves and subsequent construction of Cox proportional hazards regression models. Pre-specified secondary endpoints included trial-level assessment by random effects meta-analysis of all-cause mortality, VT recurrence, defibrillator shocks and all-cause hospitalisations. Meta-regression was performed to evaluate the effect of VT mapping in addition to substrate modification. Sensitivity analyses were performed depending on the proportion of patients with prior MI included. (PROSPERO ID CRD42023390799) Results Eight trials, recruiting a total of 874 patients, were included. 430 patients were randomised to catheter ablation and 444 to medical therapy. Catheter ablation reduced all-cause mortality compared to medical therapy when synthesising reconstructed individual patient data (hazard ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38 to 0.85, p=0.007), but not in trial-level analysis (relative risk 0.91, 95%CI 0.67 to 1.23, p=0.53, I2=0%). Catheter ablation significantly reduced VT recurrence, defibrillator shocks and hospitalisations compared to medical therapy. Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary analyses. Conclusion In patients with post-infarct ventricular tachycardia, catheter ablation reduces mortality.