Abstract

Urban gardening has become a growing international movement. Many urban gardens are established, organized, and managed collectively as commons. Particularly in developed countries, these community gardens (a subset of urban gardens) emerge not only in response to a lack of locally produced food, but also in response to a lack of democratic use of public spaces or missing opportunities and time for socializing. They then give rise to social networks that fulfil various social functions. Although community gardens are often listed as examples of commons, they have thus far lacked closer scientific examination. Hence, we present criteria to explore and categorize community gardens as commons by their degree of collectivity. This is based on five components: resource system, infrastructure, resource units, work, social time. We classify these criteria further according to various styles of use, ranging from individual use to sharing. To demonstrate the utility of this model we implement a quantitative study of community gardens located in one of the most urbanized area in Germany, the Rhine-Ruhr Agglomeration. Our results show a high diversity of collective use and the importance of sharing immaterial components in sustaining community gardens, notably social values. We can empirically demonstrate that gardeners develop diverse ways of collective action and social interaction to manage and change their urban environment. To aid in thinking about these issues, we provide an initial typology of community gardens according to their relative degrees of collectivity, reflecting the underlying values of these alternative agricultural system.

Highlights

  • Urban Agriculture (UA) has become a dynamic international movement, summarizing a diversity of forms and types

  • Drawing on the recent studies of Pourias et al (2016), Nettle (2014), and Spilková (2017) which point to the relevance of collective action in community gardens, the objective of this paper is to examine further what defines community gardens as commons and how they can be classified in regard to the intensity of their collective actions

  • Since community gardens in North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW) are further networked through the online platform UrbaneOasen we identified for the year 2016 a total number of 79 community gardens located in the RhineRuhr Agglomeration (Die Urbanisten 2016)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urban Agriculture (UA) has become a dynamic international movement, summarizing a diversity of forms and types. The focus of this paper, are in turn a subset of UG These collectively organized and self-managed gardens, provide locallyproduced food for urban residents, but rather additional benefits (Armstrong 2000; Guitart et al 2012; Lohrberg 2016) such as agricultural knowledge and education, community cohesion and development, new experience inherent to democratic forms of governance, well-being, ecosystem services or green infrastructure (Saldivar-Tanaka and Krasny 2004; Foster 2011; Bendt et al 2013; Nettle 2014; McIvor and Hale 2015; McClintock et al 2016; Spilková 2017). Despite the international importance of community gardens, there is a recognized lack of statistics and academic research on international and national level (Guitart et al 2012; Bendt et al 2013; Lohrberg 2016; Vejre and Simon-Rojo 2016)

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call