Abstract

Dyslexia is often assessed using categorical diagnoses, and subtypes of dyslexia are also recognized in a categorical fashion. Children may meet the criteria for dyslexia, and they may more specifically meet the criteria for a subtype of it, and thus get a diagnosis. This approach to diagnosis clashes with the actual distribution of reading performance in children (which is normal and continuous), and it has received criticism. This article offers a conceptual framework for conciliating these two positions. In short, the proposal is to use a set of multicomponent continuous assessments of reading, rather than thresholds. The proposal is explained using original data obtained from a sample of 30 children (age 7 to 11), tested in the United Kingdom. Using an assessment based on categorical-thresholds, only five children in our sample qualify for extra assistance, and only one may get a diagnosis of dyslexia, while with the mixed system proposed, a few additional children in the gray area would receive attention. This approach would not discard previous categorical approaches such as those distinguishing between surface and phonological dyslexia, but it would rather see these subtypes of dyslexia as the instance of a lower score on the continuum obtained on a single component of the multicomponent assessment.

Highlights

  • The National Institute of Neurological Disorders defines dyslexia as “a brain-based type of learning disability that impairs a person’s ability to read

  • The disorder varies from person to person, common characteristics among people with dyslexia are difficulties with phonological processing, spelling, and/or rapid visual-verbal responding”

  • The vast majority of assessments has a clinical aim, and for this reason, tests are designed to answer specific questions: does the child tested have dyslexia? Does the child qualify for assistance?

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The brains of children with dyslexia show peculiarities that can affect various regions, including for example the visual word form area (Dehaene and Cohen, 2011), Broca’s area (Paulesu et al, 2001), the magnocellular pathway (Stein, 2001) and the cerebellum (Nicolson et al, 2001). These patterns are not consistent across subjects (Kraft et al, 2016; Łuniewska et al, 2019), and behavioral tasks remain the most effective assessment available (Fletcher, 2009; Ramus et al, 2018). The transformation of text into sound is a complex process that involves various sub-skills, arguably phonological skills (Van Orden and Kloos, 2005), visual skills (Kulp and Schmidt, 1996), working memory (Siegel, 1994), and the coordination between them (Church et al, 2008)

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.