Abstract

Latent inhibition (LI) refers to the reduction in conditioning to a stimulus that has received repeated non-reinforced pre-exposure. Investigations into the neural substrates of LI have focused on the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and its inputs from the hippocampal formation and adjacent cortical areas. Previous work has suggested that lesions to the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), another major source of input to the NAc, do not disrupt LI. However, a failure to observe disrupted LI does not preclude the possibility that a particular brain region is involved in the expression of LI. Moreover, the mPFC is a heterogeneous structure and there has been no investigation of a possible role of different regions within the mPFC in regulating LI under conditions that prevent LI in controls. Here, we tested whether 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-induced lesions of dopamine (DA) terminals within the prelimbic (PL) and infralimbic (IL) mPFC would lead to the emergence of LI under conditions that do produce LI in controls (weak pre-exposure). LI was measured in a thirst motivated conditioned emotional response procedure with 10 pre-exposures to a noise conditioned stimulus (CS) and two conditioning trials. Sham-operated and IL-lesioned animals did not show LI and conditioned to the pre-exposed CS at comparable levels to the non-pre-exposed controls. 6-OHDA lesions to the PL, however, produced potentiation of LI. These results provide the first demonstration that the PL mPFC is a component of the neural circuitry underpinning LI.

Highlights

  • Latent inhibition (LI) manifests as poorer conditioning to a stimulus that has been previously presented without consequence (Lubow and Moore, 1959)

  • The current experiment investigated the effects of DA depletion within the PL and IL medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) on LI under experimental parameters (10 pre-exposures) designed to prevent the emergence of LI in sham-operated controls

  • 6-OHDA lesions to PL but not IL mPFC appeared to impair rats’ ability to shift responding to the changed stimulus-reinforcement contingency at conditioning as these rats continued to respond according to the stimulus-no event acquired at pre-exposure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Latent inhibition (LI) manifests as poorer conditioning to a stimulus that has been previously presented without consequence (Lubow and Moore, 1959). The failure of mPFC lesions to disrupt LI does not preclude the possibility that the mPFC is involved in the expression of LI as the role of a specific brain region in LI may only emerge under conditions that do not produce LI in controls (Weiner and Arad, 2009). One previous study has examined the potential involvement of the mPFC in the expression of LI under conditions that do not yield LI in controls (high number of conditioning trials) and found no effects of mPFC lesions (Schiller and Weiner, 2004). Nelson et al / Neuroscience 170 (2010) 99 –106 involvement of the prelimbic (PL) and infralimbic (IL) subregions of the mPFC in mediating the expression of LI using experimental parameters that do not lead to the emergence of LI in controls

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call