Abstract

In the context of social evolution research, a great emphasis on kin-selected benefits has led to understand parental care as one of the activities that helpers can perform in extended cooperative families. Nevertheless, this perspective might have precluded a deeper understanding of the implications of parental care for social evolution. We argue that parental care is a broader set of processes playing a key role both before and during the emergence of sociality. The care system of a species may be understood as the result of long coevolutionary processes with environmental pressures during pre-social stages that impact transitions to sociality. We evaluate the present framework against evidence on the evolution of parental care and transitions towards sociality in subsocial and parasocial vertebrate and invertebrate species. Moreover, following previous evidence for the importance of modes of foraging and resting we structure our inquiry by classifying societies into three types. Our results suggest that in central place foragers and fortress defenders, ecological factors promoting the evolution of parental care foster a set of coevolutionary feedback loops resulting in increases in parental effort and offspring needs. Offspring needs alone or in combination with limited breeding options enhance the relative benefits of positive social interactions, catalyzing social transitions. In itinerant foragers, sociality is associated with colonizing new niches. Changes in predation pressure entail changes in the modes of care or selection for certain types of care present already in solitary ancestors. Further changes in the form of collective defense may be needed for permanent sociality to evolve. We conclude there is evidence that social transitions to different types of societies are the result of long coevolutionary processes between environmental pressures and the care systems in a wide variety of taxa. Therefore, advances in the study of the origins of sociality may need from further investigation of parental care evolution in solitary ancestors of today's social species.

Highlights

  • Reviewed by: Joël Meunier, UMR7261 Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’insecte (IRBI), France Sheng-Feng Shen, Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taiwan

  • Maternal or biparental care initially evolved in response to biotic hazards, and their reinforcement further selected for cooperation with conspecifics for the defense of dependent offspring. Such benefits of sociality on processes derived from parental care evolution appear to be common for subsocial and parasocial transitions in fortress defenders (FD) species belonging to different taxa

  • By linking social evolution and parental care we have 1) shown that factors promoting the appearance of parental care relate to its maintenance and further modification through coevolutionary feedbacks with predators and parasites

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reviewed by: Joël Meunier, UMR7261 Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’insecte (IRBI), France Sheng-Feng Shen, Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taiwan. We evaluate the present framework against evidence on the evolution of parental care and transitions toward sociality in subsocial and parasocial vertebrate and invertebrate species. They incorporated a “diachronic” explicit reasoning on social evolution by taking into account that caring systems evolved during the transition from precocial to altricial species and that “simple” precocial families might have preceded complex societies in which young are altricial (i.e., cooperative breeding and eusocial colonies).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.