Abstract

AbstractThe sequence of the homogeneously Ru‐catalyzed epoxidation of methyl oleate and acid‐catalyzed hydrolysis of the corresponding epoxide methyl 9,10‐epoxy stearate is successfully transferred from batch into flow mode, allowing for the continuous production of methyl 9,10‐dihydroxystearate. Thereby, methyl oleate is first converted up to 97% within 14 min at excellent selectivity in the epoxidation using aqueous hydrogen peroxide as the sole oxidant. In the subsequent hydrolysis, a residence time of 10 min is sufficient for quantitative conversion of the epoxide. The desired, pure vicinal diol is isolated upon crystallization from the crude reaction mixture in an integrated process starting from technical grade (91.5%) substrate. The isolated yield is increased upon the addition of water as a green antisolvent from 75% up to 97%. Finally, the concept is transferred to methyl oleate of even lower purity (76%), still obtaining an isolated yield of 66% of the vicinal diol. Thus, the integration of sequential epoxidation and hydrolysis into continuous flow and subsequent crystallization allows for high conversion and selectivities within a total residence time of 27 min, corresponding to a space–time yield of 190 g h−1 L−1 in the epoxidation and 164 g h−1 L−1 in the hydrolysis, respectively.Practical applications: The modular flow setup enables the targeted functionalization toward the epoxide intermediate or the vicinal diol. Both offer versatile applications for the production of polymers, surfactants, or toward further conversion as in oxidative cleavage starting from methyl oleate. The application of flow chemistry offers advantages for the safe handling of hydrogen peroxide even at high temperatures. With fats and oils being natural substances, oleochemicals such as fatty acid methyl esters are typically available in technical purity so that efficient strategies for the isolation of pure products are of need. Crystallization of the product is promising, as additional organic solvents are not required. Thus, using the difference in melting point and solubility behavior of the desired product compared to other compounds is a promising method for the applicability of renewable resource‐based substrate mixtures.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.