Abstract

Catalyst or Crown: Does Naturalization Promote the Long-Term Social Integration of Immigrants?

Highlights

  • Integration of immigrant populations is an urgent and fundamental policy challenge in many countries in Europe and the Americas that have experienced dramatic increases in the size and diversity of their immigrant populations in recent decades

  • The Stock and Yogo (2005) F-test against the null that the instrument had no effect on the treatment is about 94 for the instrumental variable (IV) model and 21 for the fuzzy regression discontinuity (RD) model and much higher than the critical threshold of 10 that we need to exceed in order to avoid the problems associated with a weak instrument

  • Taken together these results suggest that naturalization earlier, rather than later, is more effective in terms of increasing the long term social integration of immigrants and this effect is strong in the sense that even a few years earlier can make a real difference for social long-term integration

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Integration of immigrant populations is an urgent and fundamental policy challenge in many countries in Europe and the Americas that have experienced dramatic increases in the size and diversity of their immigrant populations in recent decades. In stark contrast to the political rhetoric mobilizing for limiting access to host country citizenship with longer residency periods and stricter naturalization criteria, we find that the positive effects of naturalization are larger for the most marginalized groups and when immigrants naturalize earlier, rather than later, in their residency Taken together, these findings suggest that for Switzerland—and perhaps other countries with restrictive or more restrictive naturalization regimes—marginally lowering the long residency requirements and stringent naturalization criteria might well be quite beneficial to reap the full integration gains from the citizenship policy. When interpreting our results it is important to emphasize that our estimates capture the effects of naturalization only among immigrants who have applied for citizenship Among this sample, which is arguably the most relevant for current policy, we find that naturalization promotes long-term social integration and that these effects are larger for more marginalized immigrants and those who apply earlier. Our study fills an important gap by providing evidence on the effects of naturalization in Switzerland a country where the issue of naturalization is pressing: there is an unusually large immigrant population of about 27% and heated policy debates have seen right wing parties like the Swiss People’s party mobilize against mass naturalization of immigrants

Does Naturalization Lead to Better Immigrant Integration?
Double Selection Bias
Empirical Strategy
Naturalization Referendums
Identifying the Effect of Naturalization
Instrumental Variable Strategy
Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity Design Strategy
Sample and Covariates
Outcome Measures
Results
First Stage
Main Effects of Naturalization
Alienation versus Integration
Naturalization Effects by Immigrant Group
Early versus Late Naturalization
Conclusion
Report
Citizenship Policy Index
Sample
Attrition
Descriptive Statistics
First Stage Results
Main Results
Secondary Outcomes

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.