Abstract
The image of Sulla as a monster of cruelty, that was consolidated since the Late Republic, is endorsed by Cassius Dio too. But in Caesar’s speech after Thapsus, in the triumvirs’ allocution to the people during the proscriptions, in Tiberius’ epitaph for Augustus, and in Otho’s last address to the soldiers, Sulla’s cruelty is remembered in terms which remind the reader of the speech of Severus in 197, who, in turn, had praised it as an exemplum worth following. Thus a historiographical topos becomes for Dio a means to criticize the emperor, a way to express his judgment on the civil war of his times. But Dio’s criticism of Sulla’s cruelty did not imply a rejection of the work done as a legislator and reformer during his dictatorship. For Dio, Sulla did not aim to absolute power and his dictatorship was conformed to Roman traditions. The one responsible for the transformation of this magistracy into a means to exert a “monarchic” power was not Sulla, but Caesar.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.