Abstract

This paper proposes a non-weighted maximal approach of multi-attribute risk assessment for production accidents, which comes from the Chinese practice of risk management rather than the theoretical weighted multi-attribute approach. The existing literature for risk assessment of pipeline accidents, there is an absence of or lack of explicit consideration of some special dimensions, i.e., environmental pollution as the important derivative disaster. The non-weighted maximal approach is described the maximum function among multiple criteria, which include fatalities, serious injuries, direct economic loss, and environment pollutions. The approach comes from the Chinese government official achievement assessment system with the characteristics of “one ticket veto system for production safety”, and has applied to ex ante assessing likelihood of the accident, and ex post holding the responsible for accidents. At last, applying the case of the Chinese Qingdao oil pipeline accident, the maximal approach is compared with the FN curve criterion, the ALARP principle and the ELECTRE TRI method. The results show that the maximal approach of production safety accident criterion pays more attention to the risk density or risk consequences, which follows the “cask principle” and is much more useful controlling the risk when targeting the vulnerable links of engineering systems.

Highlights

  • Human industrial production system becomes the more and more complex, which leads to the inherently vulnerable

  • The pollution damage assessment of marine oil spills is a very complicated task [29], in this paper, marine environmental pollution is taken as another risk attribute of pipeline accidents

  • Along with the increasing complexity of socio-technical system in modern society, some human errors further aggravate the vulnerability of the system, which leads to a high probability for all kinds of safety accidents with serious consequences

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Human industrial production system becomes the more and more complex, which leads to the inherently vulnerable. The related responsibility departments and principle officials would be rejected in the government performance examination system, once any index, which includes fatalities, serious injuries, direct economic loss, or environment pollutions, exceed the limited values of accident damage. This simple and easy approach of risk assessment, which is known in this paper as “the non-weighted maximal approach”, is widely applied to ex ante assessing likelihood of the accident, and ex post holding the responsible for accidents in China. We further make risk assessment of pipeline systems by the FN curve criterion and the ALARP principle used in some developed countries

Risk identification-based Event Tree Analysis of pipeline accidents
Risk calculation based probit experience function
Case study of the Qingdao Pipeline Accident
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.