Abstract

This work presents the application of the multi-temporal approach of the Model Conditional Processor (MCP-MT) for predictive uncertainty (PU) estimation in the Godavari River basin, India. MCP-MT is developed for making probabilistic Bayesian decision. It is the most appropriate approach if the uncertainty of future outcomes is to be considered. It yields the best predictive density of future events and allows determining the probability that a critical warning threshold may be exceeded within a given forecast time. In Bayesian decision-making, the predictive density represents the best available knowledge on a future event to address a rational decision-making process. MCP-MT has already been tested for case studies selected in Italian river basins, showing evidence of improvement of the effectiveness of operative real-time flood forecasting systems. The application of MCP-MT for two river reaches selected in the Godavari River basin, India, is here presented and discussed by considering the stage forecasts provided by a deterministic model, STAFOM-RCM, and hourly dataset based on seven monsoon seasons in the period 2001–2010. The results show that the PU estimate is useful for finding the exceedance probability for a given hydrometric threshold as function of the forecast time up to 24 h, demonstrating the potential usefulness for supporting real-time decision-making. Moreover, the expected value provided by MCP-MT yields better results than the deterministic model predictions, with higher Nash–Sutcliffe coefficients and lower error on stage forecasts, both in term of mean error and standard deviation and root mean square error.

Highlights

  • The severe effects of flooding events are usually mitigated through structural measures, such as river banks, flood dykes and dams, that reduce but do not eliminate the risk

  • This paper shows that in areas located in developing countries significant additional benefits for the Flood Forecasting and Warning Systems (FFWSs) could be obtained, if the MCP-MT is used to estimate the predictive uncertainty of the forecasts

  • The same verification metrics are used for comparing the MCP-MT performance, in terms of expected value, with that of the deterministic forecasting model STAFOM-RCM

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The severe effects of flooding events are usually mitigated through structural measures, such as river banks, flood dykes and dams, that reduce but do not eliminate the risk. The forecasting models are fundamental components of the FFWSs and provide river stage/discharge predictions at sections of particular interest with forecast horizons appropriate to support the decision-makers activities, addressed to flood effect mitigation. These models only provide a deterministic forecast for the future event and do not deal with the decision-maker uncertainty on decisions. Flood forecasting has been typically approached through rainfall-runoff and/or flood routing models The former predict the discharge at selected river sections with a lead-time depending on.

Predictive Uncertainty Assessment
Forecasting Model
Results and Discussion
Performance Evaluation Measures
Predictive
The of MCP‐MT is affected by the model accuracy lead-times for reach
Calibration and Validation
Probability of Hydrometric Thresholds Exceedance
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call