Abstract
This paper describes a case study devised to quantify the relative contributions of geometric, thermal, contouring, and cutting force errors to machined part dimensional errors. Measurements were performed to independently evaluate the: (1) quasi-static geometric errors using the laser ball bar; (2) variations in geometric errors due to thermal effects; (3) spindle thermal growth errors using a capacitance gage nest; (4) two-dimensional contouring errors using a grid plate encoder; and (5) surface location error due to (stable) forced vibrations during cutting. The effects of the first three error components were related to part dimensions using a homogeneous transformation matrix approach integrated into a Monte Carlo simulation. A comparison of the individual influences of these error sources showed that the cutting force error was dominant for the high-speed machining center/tool-holder combination selected for this study.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
