Abstract

This research aimed to assess three case studies of in-service science teachers regarding their practices of socio-scientific issue (SSI)-based teaching as they participated in a specially developed professional development (PD) program. Data were collected throughout the PD program from group discussions, observations, interviews, and the review of documents, and they were analyzed using within-case and cross-case analysis methods. The findings showed that the PD program had positive impacts on the teachers’ practices of SSI-based teaching. There were some modifications that combined their old teaching styles and SSI-based teaching; however, they attempted to link the science content within a social context in a way that motivated student ownership of learning. They modified their roles as information providers to be learning facilitators. Their students were also encouraged to employ scientific evidence-based reasoning to address the issues under discussion. The three science teachers also added questions to enhance student thinking about the application of scientific knowledge in society. At the individual level, teaching confidence and teaching enthusiasm had powerful influences on their practices of SSI-based teaching. At the school level, the amount of teaching time and the lack of experts on SSI-based teaching in the school were found to be barriers to SSI-based teaching. The results of this study contribute to the growing body of knowledge about preparing science teachers to link their science lessons to the real world, and they also provide a framework for future studies.

Highlights

  • Under Thai educational reform, learners are regarded as being the most important stakeholders (Office of the Education Council [OEC], 2000)

  • Before participating in the professional development (PD) program, Mana, Piti, and Mali did not use any socio-scientific issue (SSI) in their classrooms; Mana was aware of the need to link science content to social contexts, as he stated during the discussion at the beginning of the PD program: “I would like to link my teaching content to social contexts because it relates to students’ daily life.”

  • Still, based on the classroom observation, he rarely discussed social issues related to science with his students, and he said to the researcher, “Today I did not use SSIs in my student discussion

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Under Thai educational reform, learners are regarded as being the most important stakeholders (Office of the Education Council [OEC], 2000). The content of teaching and learning at each educational level places emphasis on knowledge about the relationship between oneself and society, science, management, conservation, and the utilization of natural resources to ensure that the environment is balanced and sustainable (Office of the National Education Commission [ONEC], 2003). Teaching is viewed as a microcosm of society that relates to reasoning about socio-scientific issues (SSIs). Due to the characteristics of these issues, they are open-ended social problems with substantive connections to science. A lack of understanding of SSIs may lead to feelings of fear, anger, and distrust towards the scientific community (Hodson, 2008)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call