Abstract

The incidence of accidental injection or catheterization of the subdural space during performance of a neuroaxial block has recently increased. It can occur even when an experienced practitioner performs the neuraxial procedure. The presentation of numerous unexplainable clinical signs in the process of continuous epidural anesthesia, which do not fit the clinical picture of subarachnoid or intravascular injection, should envoke a high suspicion for unintentional subdural block. We report two cases of patients who achieved prolonged labor analgesia via epidural technique with only half the initial loading dose of local anesthetic. Both patients also had short episodes of hypotension. Additionally, one patient presented with severe hypoxemia and mild motor block of both upper and lower extremities. The other patient presented with transit unresponsiveness without motor block. Both patients rapidly responded to vasopressors. Desaturation in one patient, however, was persistent lasting for more than four hours. Her bedside chest X-ray was inconclusive “possible pulmonary edema” and the follow up Chest CT Scan on the second day revealed aspiration pneumonia. Based on the clinical findings, these two cases were suggestive of subdural block with cranial nerve involvement.

Highlights

  • Subdural space, a potential space between the arachnoid mater and dura mater, usually remains closed [1]

  • We report two cases of patients who achieved prolonged labor analgesia via epidural technique with only half the initial loading dose of local anesthetic

  • Based on the clinical findings, these two cases were suggestive of subdural block with cranial nerve involvement

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A potential space between the arachnoid mater and dura mater, usually remains closed [1]. The incidence of subdural blockade during neuroaxial block is reported to be approximately of 0.82%. Several recent studies of clinical findings analyzed with radiographic evaluation indicate that the incidence may be much higher than reported, ranging from 1% to 13% [2,3]. The diagnosis of subdural blocks is difficult to make based on the clinical picture because of its varied presentation. Algorithms have been developed which (Lubenow et al.’s diagnostic paradigm, Hoftman and Ferrante’s four step algorithm, and an electrical stimulation of the epidural catheter application) provide strong strategies to facilitate diagnosis [2,4,5,6]. We present two cases of atypical demonslyration of subdural block during neuroaxial block for labor analgesia

Case 1
Case 2
Findings
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call