Abstract

BackgroundUrine toxicology screens are useful in diagnosing patients who present with acute psychosis with a history of substance abuse. Being aware of potential false positive reactants is paramount in diagnostic accuracy. Currently, lamotrigine is not listed among common cross-reactants with phencyclidine (PCP). Case reportA 49 year old male (98 kg) was brought to the ED by a family member for worsening confusion and agitation. He had a history of Bipolar I, PTSD, schizoaffective disorder, hypertension, and cannabis/opioid abuse. His home medications included paliperidone, duloxetine, lamotrigine, tizanidine, hydroxyzine, and lisinopril. Upon examination, he denied intentional overdose or illicit substances, but largely mumbled incoherently. Blood pressure was 140/90 mmHg, pulse 113. A urine toxicology screen was positive for PCP and cannabinoids. Other labs were unremarkable, co-ingestants negative. By day three, his mental status vacillated but he largely gave unintelligible responses. Given the short half-life of PCP, false positives were investigated. A confirmatory blood test (collected upon admission) for PCP was found to be negative, and a serum lamotrigine level was confirmed to be positive (1.5μg/ml). Once more lucid, the patient admitted to taking large quantities of mirtazapine and tizanidine, making serotonin syndrome the more likely diagnosis. DiscussionThere is little in the medical literature describing cross-reactivity of lamotrigine and PCP on urine drug screens. This can be especially difficult to deduce in a known drug abuser who presents psychotic and non-contributory in their work up.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.