Abstract
After more than four decades of post-approval, cisplatin is still an important treatment for numerous cancers. However, acute kidney injury (AKI), defined as significant impairment of renal filtration as discussed below, is the major limiting side effect of cisplatin, occurring in approximately 30% of patients (25–33% after the first course). Cisplatin also damages the kidneys’ ability to reabsorb magnesium in 40–100% of patients, with collateral health risks due to subsequent hypomagnesemia. Multiple methods and drugs have been proposed for preventing cisplatin-induced AKI, including saline infusion with or without mannitol, which has not always prevented AKI and has been found to activate a cellular stress response in renal tubular cells. While numerous reports and trials, as well as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), support premedication with magnesium and hydration, this practice has not been universally accepted. Many clinics administer intravenous magnesium (IV) only after identification of hypomagnesemia post-cisplatin treatment, thus placing patients at risk for AKI and chronic renal loss of magnesium. We present the following case report and additional supporting evidence identifying the immediate effect of IV magnesium prior to intraperitoneal cisplatin for cycle 4 because of documented hypomagnesemia resulting in normalization of oliguria, which had been experienced for the first three cycles. The patient subsequently requested and received IV magnesium before cisplatin for the next two cycles with continuation of normal urinary output. The effect of pretreatment with IV magnesium on urine output following cisplatin has not been previously reported and further supports pre-cisplatin administration. In addition, two recent meta-analyses of clinical trials and pre-clinical research are reviewed that demonstrate effectiveness of magnesium pretreatment to preventing AKI without reducing its chemotherapeutic efficacy. This case report with additional evidence supports the adoption of administration of 1–3 g IV magnesium before cisplatin as best practice to prevent cisplatin induced AKI and hypomagnesemia regardless of patient baseline serum magnesium levels.
Highlights
Oncologists have numerous therapeutic agents for various cancers, but cisplatin, the first platinum compound the FDA approved in 1978, continues to be one of the most effective treatments against numerous cancers [1, 2]
There is no dispute regarding the renal toxicity associated with cisplatin
Hypomagnesemia occurs in 40–100% of patients following cisplatin and may persist long after chemotherapy completion, reflecting irreversible cisplatin-mediated kidney damage
Summary
Oncologists have numerous therapeutic agents for various cancers, but cisplatin, the first platinum compound the FDA approved in 1978, continues to be one of the most effective treatments against numerous cancers [1, 2]. Cisplatin is highly effective in damaging cancer cell DNA, but its use is restrained by dose-limiting side effects, including AKI, considered to be the most serious toxicity, occurring in approximately one-third of patients [3]. Even a single injection of cisplatin may result in a transient episode of AKI in 20–30% of patients [4, 5], which can be missed when measuring only the serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen. Multiple reviews have discussed the molecular mechanism of AKI induced by cisplatin, which is beyond the scope of this case report [2, 6]. Debulking was complete except for 1.5 cm tumor implant on the diaphragm. No tumor implant was identified, but cell washings were atypical and an intraperitoneal port was placed for IP therapy
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.