Case-law of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights

Abstract

The Court adopted several substantial decisions in the year 2008. Most of them focused on the right to life and the right to personal integrity which are often jeopardized by recurring cases of enforced disappearances and extra-judicial killings. A noticeable tendency has developed among the contracting states of recognizing, at least to a certain extent, their responsibility for the alleged violations. Consequently, the number of preliminary objections is in a steady decline. The Court also encourages the conclusion of friendly settlements. This brings contentious cases to a quick end and ensures that victims receive just reparations. It also provides for more efficient functioning of the Court. Despite a number of similarities with the European Court of Human Rights, the Inter-American case law clearly reveals that the Court is developing its own doctrine. Its specific approach towards the protection of human rights is adapted to the particularities observed within the region. The author of this chronicle would like to thank especially Frazer Egerton for his careful reading and help on the English version.