Abstract

AbstractThis article discusses the theory of case assignment in role and reference grammar (RRG). RRG is a monostratal, non-derivational theory which posits a direct linking between syntax and semantics; discourse-pragmatics may play a role in this linking. Case marking in RRG is handled rather differently than in other theories: first, it is not assigned on the basis of grammatical relations; second, it is not assigned on the basis of phrase structure configurations; and third, it may directly reflect the semantic or pragmatic status of an argument, in some languages. This article first summarises the linking system in RRG, concentrating on those aspects of it that are relevant to case marking. It then describes the basics of nominative-accusative and ergative-absolutive case assignment, the treatment of other significant argument-marking cases (dative and instrumental), and the two most important complications affecting these case assignment rules. It concludes with a discussion of languages in which case assignment is strongly affected by discourse-pragmatics.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.