Abstract
The Supreme Court's 2018 decision in Rankin v JJ is the high court's latest word on the Torts analysis in Canadian law. This case comment suggests that the majority decision of Karakatsanis, J has collapsed the duty of care and remoteness steps. In doing so, the Court may even have rendered discussions of remoteness redundant. The comment is a plea for a more relaxed test for foreseeability in the duty analysis, that is more consistent with the history of the develpment of the duty of care in negligence cases.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
