Abstract
This comment discusses the recent English case of M (Children), Re, which involved a dispute over access between a transgender parent and her children, who were living in an ultra-orthodox Jewish community. The author argues that the trial court decision ordering no direct access was appropriate in the circumstances, despite the order's discriminatory consequences. The author suggests that Canadian law would also support the trial court's decision.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
