Abstract

Markov chains (MCs) are widely used to model systems which evolve by visiting the states in their state spaces following the available transitions. When such systems are composed of interacting subsystems, they can be mapped to a multi-dimensional MC in which each subsystem normally corresponds to a different dimension. Usually the reachable state space of the multi-dimensional MC is a proper subset of its product state space, that is, Cartesian product of its subsystem state spaces. Compact storage of the matrix underlying such a MC and efficient implementation of analysis methods using Kronecker operations require the set of reachable states to be represented as a union of Cartesian products of subsets of subsystem state spaces. The problem of partitioning the reachable state space of a three or higher dimensional system with a minimum number of partitions into Cartesian products of subsets of subsystem state spaces is shown to be NP-complete. Two algorithms, one merge based the other refinement based, that yield possibly non-optimal partitionings are presented. Results of experiments on a set of problems from the literature and those that are randomly generated indicate that, although it may be more time and memory consuming, the refinement based algorithm almost always computes partitionings with a smaller number of partitions than the merge-based algorithm. The refinement based algorithm is insensitive to the order in which the states in the reachable state space are processed, and in many cases it computes partitionings that are optimal.

Highlights

  • Markov chains (MCs) are widely used to model systems which evolve by visiting the states in their state spaces following the available transitions

  • The number of partitions in the partitioning should be kept as small as possible. With this objective in mind, we first show that the problem of partitioning the reachable state space of a three or higher dimensional system with a minimum number of partitions into Cartesian products of subsets of subsystem state spaces is NP-complete [13]

  • Definition 3.1: The set {R(1), . . . , R(K)} is said to be a Cartesian product partitioning of the multi-dimensional reachable state space R if R(k) = ×Dd=1R(dk), the state space of the dth subsystem R(dk) ⊆ Sd consists of consecutive integers, ∪Kk=1R(k) = R, and R(k) ∩ R(l) = ∅ for d = 1, . . . , D, k = l, k, l = 1, . . . , K, and K ∈ Z>0

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Markov chains (MCs) are widely used to model systems which evolve by visiting the states in their state spaces following the available transitions. Compact storage of the matrix underlying the multi-dimensional MC incident on the reachable state space and efficient implementation of relevant analysis methods using Kronecker operations require the set of reachable states to be represented as a union of Cartesian products of subsets of subsystem state spaces [8]. The number of partitions in the partitioning should be kept as small as possible With this objective in mind, we first show that the problem of partitioning the reachable state space of a three or higher dimensional system with a minimum number of partitions into Cartesian products of subsets of subsystem state spaces is NP-complete [13]. We present two algorithms that can be used to compute possibly non-optimal partitionings of the reachable state space into Cartesian products of subsets of subsystem state spaces.

NOTATION AND DEFINITIONS
CARTESIAN PRODUCT PARTITIONING ALGORITHMS
Merge-Based Partitioning
Refinement-Based Partitioning
27: Insert Z to PQ
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
Test Problems from Literature
A Class of Random Test Problems
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.