Abstract

AbstractMetal oxides are considered as stable and low‐cost photoelectrode candidates for hydrogen production by photoelectrochemical solar water splitting. However, their power conversion efficiencies usually suffer from poor transport of photogenerated charge carriers, which has been attributed previously to a variety of effects occurring on different time and length scales. In search for common understanding and for a better photo‐conducting metal oxide photoabsorber, CuFeO2, α‐SnWO4, BaSnO3, FeVO4, CuBi2O4, α‐Fe2O3, and BiVO4 are compared. Their kinetics of thermalization, trapping, localization, and recombination are monitored continuously 100 fs–100 µs and mobilities are determined for different probing lengths by combined time‐resolved terahertz and microwave spectroscopy. As common issue, we find small mobilities < 3 cm2V‐1s‐1. Partial carrier localization further slows carrier diffusion beyond localization lengths of 1–6 nm and explains the extraordinarily long conductivity tails, which should not be taken as a sign of long diffusion lengths. For CuFeO2, the localization is attributed to electrostatic barriers that enclose the crystallographic domains. The most promising novel material is BaSnO3, which exhibits the highest mobility after reducing carrier localization by annealing in H2. Such overcoming of carrier localization should be an objective of future efforts to enhance charge transport in metal oxides.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.