Abstract

Background: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is the commonest upper limb nerve entrapment syndrome seen in practice. In many centres, nerve conduction studies (NCS) have been adopted as a routine part of the diagnostic process. In the United Kingdom, the time taken to access diagnostic tests has been likened to a “hidden waiting list”, lengthening the time taken for a patient to access treatment. In the current healthcare climate with a centrally driven aim to reduce patient waiting time to a maximum of eighteen weeks, including tests, such waiting is even more unacceptable. Aim. This study was performed in order to evaluate a simple handheld device for quantifying median nerve lesions in CTS. Design of study: A prospective blinded cohort study. Setting: Leicester General Hospital, Carpal Tunnel Service Method: Participants were recruited from the nor-mal referral stream. If the clinical findings were consistent with a diagnosis of CTS, they were for-mally consented to the study in which results from the new handheld device were compared with traditional NCS. Final test group consisted of 63 participants. Results: For the new device the correct positive detection rate for abnormal nerve conduction was 91% (74/81 hands). Of the seven abnormal results not picked up by the new device, four were in asymptomatic hands (positive per cent agree-ment in symptomatic hands 95%). There were no false positives with the new system. (Negative per cent agreement 100%) Conclusion: We conclude that this new device demonstrates a high degree of concordance with currently available traditional NCS. The study suggested ways in which the accuracy could be further improved.

Highlights

  • Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is the most common upper limb nerve entrapment syndrome [1,2]

  • If the clinical findings were consistent with a diagnosis of CTS, they were formally consented to the study in which results from the new handheld device were compared with traditional nerve conduction studies (NCS)

  • There were no false positives with the new system. (Negative per cent agreement 100%) Conclusion: We conclude that this new device demonstrates a high degree of concordance with currently available traditional NCS

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is the most common upper limb nerve entrapment syndrome [1,2]. Nerve conduction studies (NCS) have been adopted as a routine part of the diagnostic process despite evidence that up to 16% of patients may have normal studies in the presence of clinically proven CTS [3,4]. Insisting on NCS for every patient satisfies the clinicians’ need for objective evidence but adds a significant extra expense and delay to the diagnosis and treatment of this very common condition. It may introduce a false negative, failing to diagnose CTS when it is present [1]. This paper describes a study designed to compare results from the new device with traditional NCS

Background
METHODS
Participants
Interventions
Main Outcome Measures
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call