Abstract

Plaque characteristics play pivotal roles in ischemic events, but stenosis severity does not accurately reflect carotid plaque volume due to expansive remodeling in some patients with low-grade stenosis (LGS). This study aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, and durability of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for symptomatic LGS. Study participants comprised 61 consecutive patients who underwent CEA for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Patients were divided into an LGS group (<50%, n= 17) and a non-LGS group (≥50%, n= 44). Patient characteristics and short-term (within 30 days of CEA) and long-term outcomes were compared between groups for selective usage of internal shunt and known complications of CEA. Magnetic resonance imaging-detected intraplaque hemorrhage was more significant in LGS than in non-LGS (P= 0.04). For short-term outcomes, no symptomatic infarcts, hyperperfusion syndrome, or acute myocardial infarction was confirmed in either group. Internal shunts were used in 4 LGS (23.5%) and 6 non-LGS (13.6%). Asymptomatic diffusion-weighted imaging-positive lesions were confirmed in 2 LGS patients (11.8%) and 5 non-LGS patients (11.4%), neck hematoma in 1 LGS patient, and transient cranial nerve palsy in 1 LGS patient and 2 non-LGS patients, with no significant differences apparent between groups. For long-term outcomes, 5 non-LGS patients showed restenosis (P= 0.17). Hemorrhagic stroke was not observed in either group. No significant differences were seen for infarct in the ipsilateral carotid territory, any ischemic stroke, AMI, or mortality. CEA represents a safe and feasible therapeutic option for a subset of patients with symptomatic LGS.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call