Abstract

The purpose of this work was to compare inter- and intraobserver agreement in the analysis of CAWT by using MDCTA. The CAWT in 35 patients was quantified by 4 observers. Bland-Altman statistics were used to measure the agreement between observers. The results of our study demonstrated that the CAWT measured by using MDCTA shows a good reproducibility between observers by considering inter- and intraobserver agreement.

Highlights

  • Until now, no reproducibility study has been proposed; the purpose of this article was to compare inter- and intraobserver agreement among 4 readers in the analysis of CAWT by using MDCTA

  • We measured CAWT between the leading edge of the opacified lumen vessel and the external visible limit of the artery wall, where it was surrounded by adjacent adipose tissue

  • Inter- and intraobserver agreement was evaluated by using the Bland-Altman analysis.[22]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Until now, no reproducibility study has been proposed; the purpose of this article was to compare inter- and intraobserver agreement among 4 readers in the analysis of CAWT by using MDCTA. Four different observers (with 11 years, 10 years, 7 years, and 3 years of experience in CT angiography of carotid arteries) analyzed the datasets and measured the CAWT by using dedicated software. Inter- and intraobserver agreement was evaluated by using the Bland-Altman analysis.[22] A folded empiric cumulative distribution plot

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call