Abstract

Objective: This cross-sectional research evaluated caries prevalence and treatment need in pre-school children using different indexes. Material and Methods: A sample of 931 children (3-5 years old) attending public schools were examined by two calibrated researchers, who recorded the caries prevalence using dmf-t and ICDAS II. The clinical records obtained directed the decision regarding the treatment needs, which were divided into non-invasive and invasive procedures according to the scores registered in the different caries indexes. Descriptive statistics were used to present the data related to each index; qui-square test was used to compare the need of invasive and non-invasive treatment in the different ages. Results: The mean dmf-t was 1.8 ± 2.9, with a 42.9% caries prevalence. Using cut-off points of ICDAS II (≥1, ≥3 and ≥4), the caries prevalence values found were 50.7%, 40.8% and 30.7%, respectively. Five-year-old children exhibited the highest caries prevalence, assessed with dmf-t or ≥3 and ≥4 cut-off points of ICDAS II (≥3: p=0.032; ≥4: p=0.015). The percentages of caries-free children were 49.1% and 57.1%, respectively for ICDAS II and dmf-t. Restorative treatment in at least one tooth was required by 30.7% and 40% of the children for ICDAS II and dmf-t. Only ICDAS II could establish the percentage of non-invasive treatments (20%). Both indices pointed out the expressive need of restorative treatment. Conclusion: The use of dmf-t in epidemiological surveys may underestimate caries prevalence whereas the ICDAS II allowed the identification of early carious lesions and the viability of the use of non-invasive procedures as caries control measures in a child population.

Highlights

  • Data from epidemiological research reflect the oral health status of a given population at a specific period

  • Restorative treatment in at least one tooth was required by 30.7% and 40% of the children for International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) II and dmf-t

  • The use of dmf-t in epidemiological surveys may underestimate caries prevalence whereas the ICDAS II allowed the identification of early carious lesions and the viability of the use of non-invasive procedures as caries control measures in a child population

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Data from epidemiological research reflect the oral health status of a given population at a specific period. They are the foundation of the strategic planning in dental services, enabling the development of effective programs in prevention and dental treatment [1,2]. The use of non-invasive and more conservative procedures has increased, which has contributed to huge changes in the clinical protocols for caries treatment [5,6]. In order to support these transformations, a need for the development of new indices for caries epidemiological research, as well as for clinical and academic purposes has appeared

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call